The nightly sync for orders, events, and user_sessions landed 14% fewer rows in DuckDB than the warehouse source. The gap appeared after Wednesday's schema migration and is growing with each load. Flagging for review before downstream models consume stale counts.
An agent watches one thing and acts on it. Not a workflow, just a standing watch that usually does nothing and acts the moment it should.
An agent does what you'd do, and only what you've authorized.
It acts on the same governed metrics as your dashboards, and every action is logged and traceable.
It alerts and recommends on its own; anything that changes data is yours to approve.
Point a new agent at a throwaway channel and watch its judgment before it touches anything real.
It remembers what it already flagged and waits before acting again, so it won't alert you about the same thing twice.
It compares your DuckDB tables against the upstream warehouse or production database and flags row-count gaps, schema mismatches, and stale syncs before your downstream models consume bad data. So the number in DuckDB and the number in the warehouse are the same, and you find the drift yourself instead of in somebody else's broken dashboard.
Point it at a metric you care about (conversion rate, order volume, session counts, whatever your tables describe) and it watches on your schedule. When it breaks trend, it tells you which segment moved and by how much, then hands off to Fi to investigate the why across the data it can see.
When a column type changes, a table disappears, or a view definition silently shifts, the agent catches it from the schema catalog and flags the downstream impact before your dbt models or notebooks hit a runtime error. You find out from a Slack message, not from a failed job at 2 a.m.
Beyond alerts and write-backs, an agent can run arbitrary Python, so it can do whatever the task actually requires: call an API, kick off a job, reshape the data, or wire into your own tooling. The action space is yours to define.
You could rig one of these with a cron job and a Slack webhook in an afternoon. The watching is the easy part. Here's what you'd own forever, and don't, here:
Every DuckDB object, modeled and query-ready the moment you connect.
It runs on your real DuckDB files (Parquet references, half-documented views, tables nobody formally cataloged yet), not a tidy demo. You define the metric once as governed SQL and it watches that.
A message in the channel you choose, with the context and a button to act on it.
A summary in the inbox of the people who need to see it.
A payload to your own systems, to wire the agent into whatever you already run.
A flag written back to your warehouse for everything downstream to pick up.
Kick the question to Fi to investigate the why and propose the fix.
Expose it to your own agents and tools over MCP, and drive it from your stack.
Run it in your own VPC or fully self-hosted. Everything it does is pure SQL and Python you can inspect.
Fi is your AI analyst. It helps you build and customize everything in Definite, including the agents that watch and act.
Your AI analyst. Ask questions in plain English, and let it help you build and customize everything in Definite, including your agents.
Meet Fi →The watchers and actors. Once you've built one, it runs on its own, keeping an eye on what matters and acting the way you would.
Autonomous agents →