Suggestion #1042 picked up 19 new supporters this week, 15 of them from accounts in your $20k+ ARR tier. Joining to your billing data, the requesting accounts represent $340k in combined ARR, and 3 have open churn-risk flags in the CRM. The feature is still marked 'Under Review' with no linked roadmap item.
An agent watches one thing and acts on it. Not a workflow, just a standing watch that usually does nothing and acts the moment it should.
An agent does what you'd do, and only what you've authorized.
It acts on the same governed metrics as your dashboards, and every action is logged and traceable.
It alerts and recommends on its own; anything that changes data is yours to approve.
Point a new agent at a throwaway channel and watch its judgment before it touches anything real.
It remembers what it already flagged and waits before acting again, so it won't alert you about the same thing twice.
It joins your UserVoice suggestions and supporters to your billing and CRM data, so you can see which requests carry the most ARR, which accounts are at churn risk, and which roadmap gaps are costing you expansion. You stop prioritizing by vote count and start prioritizing by revenue impact.
When your NPS score drops for a segment or account tier, it tells you which cohort moved, by how much, and surfaces the verbatim comments driving the decline. You hear about the sentiment shift in days, not at the next quarterly review.
When a suggestion accumulates supporters faster than its baseline and has no linked feature or status update, it tells you which one, the supporter velocity, and the account-tier breakdown. You find the gap in your roadmap before customers start telling your CS team they feel ignored.
Beyond alerts and write-backs, an agent can run arbitrary Python, so it can do whatever the task actually requires: call an API, kick off a job, reshape the data, or wire into your own tooling. The action space is yours to define.
You could rig one of these with a cron job and a Slack webhook in an afternoon. The watching is the easy part. Here's what you'd own forever, and don't, here:
Every UserVoice object, modeled and query-ready the moment you connect.
It runs on your real UserVoice account (duplicate suggestions, stale status labels, test users and all), not a tidy demo.
A message in the channel you choose, with the context and a button to act on it.
A summary in the inbox of the people who need to see it.
A payload to your own systems, to wire the agent into whatever you already run.
A flag written back to your warehouse for everything downstream to pick up.
Kick the question to Fi to investigate the why and propose the fix.
Expose it to your own agents and tools over MCP, and drive it from your stack.
Run it in your own VPC or fully self-hosted. Everything it does is pure SQL and Python you can inspect.
Fi is your AI analyst. It helps you build and customize everything in Definite, including the agents that watch and act.
Your AI analyst. Ask questions in plain English, and let it help you build and customize everything in Definite, including your agents.
Meet Fi →The watchers and actors. Once you've built one, it runs on its own, keeping an eye on what matters and acting the way you would.
Autonomous agents →