The orders table averaged 1.6M rows/day last week but only 940K landed in the last 24 hours. The revenue_daily, cohort_retention, and forecast_input models all read from it, so the exec dashboard has been undercounting since the 02:15 UTC load.
An agent watches one thing and acts on it. Not a workflow, just a standing watch that usually does nothing and acts the moment it should.
An agent does what you'd do, and only what you've authorized.
It acts on the same governed metrics as your dashboards, and every action is logged and traceable.
It alerts and recommends on its own; anything that changes data is yours to approve.
Point a new agent at a throwaway channel and watch its judgment before it touches anything real.
It remembers what it already flagged and waits before acting again, so it won't alert you about the same thing twice.
It reconciles the rows landing in Snowflake against the same entities in your other sources, your dbt models, and your downstream reporting layer, and flags the gaps before they reach a dashboard. You find out that the source-of-record and the warehouse disagree while it is still a sync problem, not a number someone already presented.
When row counts, load timing, or null rates on a table break their trend, it tells you which table is affected and what reads from it, then looks at why the load came up short. You hear about a broken pipeline from the agent, not from someone staring at a dashboard that is quietly wrong.
When a column gets added, dropped, or retyped, or a view definition shifts under you, it surfaces the change and the models and dashboards that depend on it before the next run fails. The drift that usually shows up as a red pipeline at 6am becomes a heads-up you can act on.
Beyond alerts and write-backs, an agent can run arbitrary Python, so it can do whatever the task actually requires: call an API, kick off a job, reshape the data, or wire into your own tooling. The action space is yours to define.
You could rig one of these with a cron job and a Slack webhook in an afternoon. The watching is the easy part. Here's what you'd own forever, and don't, here:
Every Snowflake object, modeled and query-ready the moment you connect.
It runs on your real Snowflake account (half-loaded staging tables, orphaned views, the schema nobody remembers creating), not a clean demo warehouse.
A message in the channel you choose, with the context and a button to act on it.
A summary in the inbox of the people who need to see it.
A payload to your own systems, to wire the agent into whatever you already run.
A flag written back to your warehouse for everything downstream to pick up.
Kick the question to Fi to investigate the why and propose the fix.
Expose it to your own agents and tools over MCP, and drive it from your stack.
Run it in your own VPC or fully self-hosted. Everything it does is pure SQL and Python you can inspect.
Fi is your AI analyst. It helps you build and customize everything in Definite, including the agents that watch and act.
Your AI analyst. Ask questions in plain English, and let it help you build and customize everything in Definite, including your agents.
Meet Fi →The watchers and actors. Once you've built one, it runs on its own, keeping an eye on what matters and acting the way you would.
Autonomous agents →