Qualified applications for engineering roles dropped 38% over the past two weeks while open reqs held steady, pulling your pipeline ratio well below the 3:1 baseline. Six roles with target start dates before August have fewer than 2 candidates past the technical screen.
An agent watches one thing and acts on it. Not a workflow, just a standing watch that usually does nothing and acts the moment it should.
An agent does what you'd do, and only what you've authorized.
It acts on the same governed metrics as your dashboards, and every action is logged and traceable.
It alerts and recommends on its own; anything that changes data is yours to approve.
Point a new agent at a throwaway channel and watch its judgment before it touches anything real.
It remembers what it already flagged and waits before acting again, so it won't alert you about the same thing twice.
It reconciles your open requisitions and offer data against your headcount plan and compensation budget, and flags the gaps before the quarterly review, so the pipeline your recruiting team reports matches the roles finance approved and the dollars still available. You stop finding out a req was unfunded after the offer goes out.
When conversion between interview stages drops or time-in-stage breaks its trend, it tells you which roles, which stage, and how many candidates are stuck, then hands off to Fi to investigate whether it is a scheduling gap, a scoring pattern, or a capacity problem. You see the stall forming while there is still time to fix it.
When a source that used to produce hires starts generating volume but no offers, it surfaces the channel, the drop-off stage, and the archive reasons behind it, so you know whether the channel degraded or the bar moved. You reallocate spend on the real conversion data, not last quarter's assumption.
Beyond alerts and write-backs, an agent can run arbitrary Python, so it can do whatever the task actually requires: call an API, kick off a job, reshape the data, or wire into your own tooling. The action space is yours to define.
You could rig one of these with a cron job and a Slack webhook in an afternoon. The watching is the easy part. Here's what you'd own forever, and don't, here:
Every Ashby object, modeled and query-ready the moment you connect.
It runs on your real Ashby account (archived candidates, rejected offers, requisitions nobody closed, and all), not a tidy demo.
A message in the channel you choose, with the context and a button to act on it.
A summary in the inbox of the people who need to see it.
A payload to your own systems, to wire the agent into whatever you already run.
A flag written back to your warehouse for everything downstream to pick up.
Kick the question to Fi to investigate the why and propose the fix.
Expose it to your own agents and tools over MCP, and drive it from your stack.
Run it in your own VPC or fully self-hosted. Everything it does is pure SQL and Python you can inspect.
Fi is your AI analyst. It helps you build and customize everything in Definite, including the agents that watch and act.
Your AI analyst. Ask questions in plain English, and let it help you build and customize everything in Definite, including your agents.
Meet Fi →The watchers and actors. Once you've built one, it runs on its own, keeping an eye on what matters and acting the way you would.
Autonomous agents →