8 of 12 engineers are booked above weekly capacity for the next two weeks, with 340 scheduled hours against 288 available. Three projects with milestones before July 10 have assignments that overlap with higher-priority work, and two placeholders still have no person assigned.
An agent watches one thing and acts on it. Not a workflow, just a standing watch that usually does nothing and acts the moment it should.
An agent does what you'd do, and only what you've authorized.
It acts on the same governed metrics as your dashboards, and every action is logged and traceable.
It alerts and recommends on its own; anything that changes data is yours to approve.
Point a new agent at a throwaway channel and watch its judgment before it touches anything real.
It remembers what it already flagged and waits before acting again, so it won't alert you about the same thing twice.
It reconciles your scheduled assignments and capacity against your Harvest time-tracking actuals and project budgets, and flags the gap before it compounds. When the schedule says 40 hours but actuals are running 28, you find out this week, not at the retro. Overbooking, underbooking, and phantom assignments all surface against the numbers that actually landed.
When a project milestone is approaching and the assignments behind it are short-staffed, over-allocated, or slipping against actuals, it tells you which people and projects are affected, how many hours are missing, and whether a placeholder still needs a real person. You see the risk while you can still move someone.
When a role is overbooked while another sits underutilized, it surfaces the imbalance, the projects competing for the same people, and the clients whose timelines are exposed. You rebalance on the real allocation data, not last month's assumption about who is available.
Beyond alerts and write-backs, an agent can run arbitrary Python, so it can do whatever the task actually requires: call an API, kick off a job, reshape the data, or wire into your own tooling. The action space is yours to define.
You could rig one of these with a cron job and a Slack webhook in an afternoon. The watching is the easy part. Here's what you'd own forever, and don't, here:
Every Harvest Forecast object, modeled and query-ready the moment you connect.
It runs on your real Harvest Forecast account (placeholder assignments nobody filled, archived people still on projects, overlapping allocations and all), not a tidy demo.
A message in the channel you choose, with the context and a button to act on it.
A summary in the inbox of the people who need to see it.
A payload to your own systems, to wire the agent into whatever you already run.
A flag written back to your warehouse for everything downstream to pick up.
Kick the question to Fi to investigate the why and propose the fix.
Expose it to your own agents and tools over MCP, and drive it from your stack.
Run it in your own VPC or fully self-hosted. Everything it does is pure SQL and Python you can inspect.
Fi is your AI analyst. It helps you build and customize everything in Definite, including the agents that watch and act.
Your AI analyst. Ask questions in plain English, and let it help you build and customize everything in Definite, including your agents.
Meet Fi →The watchers and actors. Once you've built one, it runs on its own, keeping an eye on what matters and acting the way you would.
Autonomous agents →